There is a lot of debate in the photography world about whether a high megapixel camera is better. Some say that the more megapixels a camera has, the better it is. Others say that there are diminishing returns when it comes to megapixels and that other factors, like lens quality, are more important. So, which is it? Let’s take a closer look at the pros and cons of high megapixel cameras to see if we can come to a conclusion.
On the plus side, more megapixels means more detail and resolution in your photos. If you’re shooting something like a landscape or architecture where you want to be able to capture all the tiny details, a high megapixel camera will be ideal. Additionally, if you plan on printing your photos large or cropping them heavily, you’ll need all those extra pixels to avoid losing too much detail.
On the downside, high megapixel cameras can be more expensive and they often require more powerful computers to process all those extra pixels. Additionally, unless you have top-notch lenses, that extra resolution isn’t going to do you any good anyway since lenses are usually the weakest link in terms of image quality.
So, what’s the verdict? Is a high megapixel camera better? It depends on your needs as a photographer. If you need maximum detail and resolution, go for it. But if you’re on a budget or don’t plan on printing huge enlargements, you might be just as well off with a less expensive camera with fewer megapixels.
Frequently Asked Question
Is a high megapixel camera better?
It’s no longer true that the higher a camera’s megapixel count the better. The only thing more megapixels will give you is the ability to enlarge and crop pictures without individual pixels becoming visible. Other factors are much more important in determining overall picture quality. 
Yes, a high megapixel camera is better. A higher megapixel camera means that you can take higher quality photos and print them out at a larger size without losing any detail.